Johnson v. Barnes et al
| Andrea Johnson |
| Brian Barnes, Shelley Brandt, Margaret Brost, Marc T Christenson, Melissa Denton, Mike DeWitt, Jane/John Does, Jonathon Lack and Kimberly Reid |
| 3:2017cv05927 |
| November 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| XX US, Outside District |
| Benjamin H. Settle |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER: The Court dismisses Johnson's remaining claims without prejudice for failing to properly serve defendants almost a year after filing her original complaint; and denies the Motions to Appeal in forma pauperis. (appeal number 18-35813) **SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS** Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (CMG)(Court of Appeals adhoc'd)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle granting 57 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 61 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 64 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 71 Motion to Strike Reply. Defendants Brian Barnes and Jonathon Lack terminated. Plaintiff to file a response by 9/14/2018 re service of remaining defendants. (TG)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle granting 44 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 49 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Kimberly S Reid, Marc T Christenson and Mike DeWitt terminated. (TG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
