Estrada v. Berryhill
| Cindy M. Estrada |
| Nancy A Berryhill |
| 3:2018cv05362 |
| May 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Thurston |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Mary Alice Theiler |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's 68 Motion and 72 Cross Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff's attorney, Jeanette Laffoon, is awarded reasonable fees in the sum of $6,545.17. Plaintiff's attorney, Eitan Yanich, is awarded rea sonable fees in the sum of $6,545.17. This net payment of fees comprises 25% of Plaintiff's past-due benefits minus the previously awarded EAJA fees. Any payment of fees is from the claimant's withheld past-due benefits. If the Co mmissioner has not withheld past-due benefits sufficient to satisfy this order and Plaintiffs' attorneys report they are unable to collect the fee from the claimant, the Commissioner will satisfy this order via the procedures in the Program Operation Manual System (POMS) GN 03920.055.C. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER granting Defendant's 77 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall have up to and including 2/19/2024, to file Defendant's response to "Cross Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)," Dkt. # 72 . Plaintiff shall have up to and including 2/23/2024, to file a reply. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 61 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is awarded fees in the amount of $24,037.21 ($24,348.70 in attorney fees requested, less $256.49 and $55 of attorney and paralega l fees respectively incurred in relation to the initial EAJA petition on 7/28/2021) and $207.49 in expenses (less $1,503.00 incurred for copying costs), subject to any offset allowed under the Treasury Offset Program. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting Parties' 57 Stipulated Motion to Reopen and Enter Judgment. This matter is reopened. Consistent with the partially favorable final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, dated 5/26/2023, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 48 Motion for Extension of Time to File Appeal. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 41 Motion to Issue Corrected Order and Judgment; denying Plaintiff's 32 Motion for EAJA Fees, Cost, and Expenses as premature. This matter remains REMANDED for further administrative proceedings in a manner consistent with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' memorandum decision. See Dkts. # 27 - 30 . Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 38 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's EAJA Reply Brief shall be filed on or beforeSeptember 24, 2021. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER OF REMAND: This Court hereby finds and ORDERS that pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings in a manner consistent with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' memorandum decision. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SR)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 16 and affirming the decision of the Commissioner. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Granting 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (KMP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Estrada v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Kerry Jane Keefe(Designation Assistant US Attorney) |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cindy M. Estrada | |
| Represented By: | Jeanette Laffoon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
