Mitchem v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Plaintiff: Drew Mitchem
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Case Number: 3:2018cv05366
Filed: May 8, 2018
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Lewis
Presiding Judge: Benjamin H. Settle
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 18, 2018 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Denying Defendant's 12 Motion for a Protective Order signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (GMR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchem v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Drew Mitchem
Represented By: David Merritt Beninger
Represented By: Robert N Gellatly, Jr.
Represented By: J Andrew Hoyal, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Represented By: Warren E. Babb, Jr.
Represented By: Jeffrey M Odom
Represented By: Tim D. Wackerbarth
Represented By: Andrew Gordon Yates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?