Ruffino v. City of Puyallup et al
| Roy Ruffino |
| City of Puyallup, Kevin Yamamoto, David McDonald and Ryan Portmann |
| 3:2018cv05381 |
| May 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Thurston |
| Benjamin H. Settle |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER denying Defendant's 108 Motion for Reconsideration; signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. The Court understands the City's need for clarity to incorporate the Court's intent into its traffic safety plan. However, the Court's view is that the contours of narrowly tailored safety regulation at the Gold gate should be established through further briefing on a permanent injunction, which the Court expects will be filed in due course.(SP)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 56 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 59 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MGC)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 10 , GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONTINUE 28 , AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 16 by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (TG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
