Harsin v Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Steven W Harsin
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2018cv05679
Filed: August 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Cowlitz
Presiding Judge: James P Donohue
Referring Judge: Benjamin H Settle
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Sarah L Martin on behalf of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Martin, Sarah)
August 27, 2018 Filing 6 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Social Security Administration on 8/27/2018 (Stolzberg, Karen)
August 22, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security, OGC. (KMP)
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Granting #2 Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (KMP)
August 21, 2018 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by William M. McCool. Case reassigned to Judge Benjamin H. Settle and referred for review and preparation of report and recommendation to Hon. James P. Donohue. Cc to BHS. (KMP)
August 21, 2018 Hon. James P. Donohue added. (CMG)
August 20, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff Steven W Harsin. (Stolzberg, Karen) Modified on 8/21/2018: corrected event type. (CMG).
August 20, 2018 Filing 1 PROPOSED COMPLAINT against defendant Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Steven W Harsin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Stolzberg, Karen) (IFP pending) Modified on 8/21/2018: corrected fee status and edited docket text to included "Proposed" before the complaint (CMG). Modified on 8/22/2018 to strike proposed as IFP Granted. (KMP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harsin v Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Kerry Jane Keefe
Represented By: Sarah L Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven W Harsin
Represented By: Karen Gale Stolzberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?