Zhuang et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Zhiming Zhuang and Huinan Yu |
National Railroad Passenger Corporation |
3:2018cv05684 |
August 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Tacoma Office |
King |
Benjamin H Settle |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on National Railroad Passenger Corporation dba Amtrak on 9/7/2018, filed by Plaintiffs Huinan Yu, Zhiming Zhuang. (Gellatly, Robert) |
Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Other Affiliate Passenger Railroad Insurance Limited (PRIL), Other Affiliate Washington Terminal Company (WTC) for National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Yates, Andrew) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with JURY DEMAND by National Railroad Passenger Corporation.(Yates, Andrew) |
Filing 9 ORDER on the #7 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Sean P Driscoll for plaintiffs Huinan Yu and Zhiming Zhuang, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(GMR) |
Filing 8 ORDER on the #6 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Kevin P. Durkin for plaintiffs Huinan Yu and Zhiming Zhuang, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(GMR) |
Filing 7 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Sean P. Driscoll FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiffs Huinan Yu, Zhiming Zhuang (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-5458778 (Gellatly, Robert) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Kevin P. Durkin FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiffs Huinan Yu, Zhiming Zhuang (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-5458777 (Gellatly, Robert) |
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, National Railroad Passenger Corporation must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 9/4/2018. (GMR) |
Attorneys Tim D. Wackerbarth, Warren E. Babb, Jr and Katie Bass added for National Railroad Passenger Corporation, per #5 Notice of Appearance. (GMR) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Andrew Gordon Yates on behalf of Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (Yates, Andrew) |
Filing 4 ORDER Requiring Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (TG) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (TG) |
Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (GMR) |
Judge Benjamin H. Settle added. (GMR) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Status Report due by 11/21/2018. (TG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES against defendant(s) National Railroad Passenger Corporation with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # 0981-5440926) filed by Zhiming Zhuang, Huinan Yu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Gellatly, Robert) Modified on 8/23/2018 (GMR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.