Rossich v. BNSF Railway Company
| Illderbrando Rossich |
| BNSF Railway Company |
| 3:2018cv05829 |
| October 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ronald B Leighton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with JURY DEMAND by BNSF Railway Company.(Chait, Michael) |
Filing 9
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 1/14/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 12/31/2018, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 1/7/2019, by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Ronald B. Leighton for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge David W. Christel no longer assigned to case, by Clerk, William M. McCool. (KEB) |
| Attorney Hayley Suzanne Ventoza for BNSF Railway Company added; per #6 Notice of Appearance. (SWT) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Michael Eliott Chait on behalf of Defendant BNSF Railway Company. (Chait, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by Judge David W. Christel. (KEB)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT. Joint Status Report due by 1/14/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 12/31/2018, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 1/7/2019, by Judge David W. Christel. (KEB)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND CONSENT FORM. If declining consent, return the executed form by 12/14/2018. Please Note: Forms must not be electronically filed with the Court. (KEB) |
| Filing 2 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant BNSF Railway Company (CMG) |
| Joint Status Report NOTED on motion calendar; Noting Date 1/14/2019. (KEB) |
| Judge David W. Christel added. (CMG) |
| ***NOTICE TO PARTIES*** re #3 Consent Form. This district has adopted an opt-out consent procedure. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily CONSENTED to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge UNLESS the consent form is returned by the due date indicating lack of consent. (KEB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant BNSF Railway Company with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # 0981-5505192), filed by Illderbrando Rossich. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Vucinovich, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rossich v. BNSF Railway Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Illderbrando Rossich | |
| Represented By: | James K Vucinovich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BNSF Railway Company | |
| Represented By: | Hayley Suzanne Ventoza |
| Represented By: | Michael Eliott Chait |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
