Rho v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Company
| James Rho |
| Oregon Mutual Insurance Company, an Oregon Corporation and Oregon Mutual Insurance Company |
| 3:2018cv05963 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Robert J Bryan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DISMISSAL, granting #11 . Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Re Dismissal by parties (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dinning, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT. FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 2/11/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 2/19/2019, Joint Status Report due by 2/25/2019. Authorized by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL) Paper copy sent to plaintiff's attorney Fogerty at Lakewood address . Modified on 11/26/2018 (JL).
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS. Authorized by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL) Paper copy sent to plaintiff's attorney Fogerty at Lakewood address . Modified on 11/26/2018 (JL).
|
| NOTICE to disregard deficiency notice re Civil Cover Sheet. Civil Cover Sheet received with initial filing. (GMR) |
| JSR due 2/25/2019. (JL) |
| Filing 8 LETTER from Clerk to counsel re receipt of case from Pierce County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (GMR- cc: Sam J. Fogerty @ sfogerty@comcast.net and via USPS) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER of Case Opening Deficiency: re #1 Notice of Removal - plaintiff's counsel not admitted to practice; Civil Cover Sheet not filed. ** Action Required ** See Attached Letter for More Information and Instructions. (GMR- cc: Sam J. Fogerty @ sfogerty@comcast.net and via USPS) Modified on 11/26/2018 (GMR). |
| Judge Robert J. Bryan added. (GMR) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Defendant Oregon Mutual Insurance Company, an Oregon Corporation re #5 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Dinning, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Oregon Mutual Insurance Company, an Oregon Corporation (Dinning, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Plaintiff re #1 Notice of Removal, ; filed by Defendant Oregon Mutual Insurance Company, an Oregon Corporation. (Dinning, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant Oregon Mutual Insurance Company, an Oregon Corporation (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Case Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment 2 - Summons to Oregon Mutual, #3 Attachment 3 - State Court Complaint, #4 Attachment 4 - Order Setting Case Schedule, #5 Attachment 5 - Acceptance of Service by OIC, #6 Attachment 6 - Affidavit of Service on OMI, #7 Attachment 7 - Notice of Appearance of OMI, #8 Attachment 8 - State Court Notice of Removal)(Dinning, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Defendant Oregon Mutual Insurance Company, an Oregon Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, (Dinning, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pierce County Superior, case number 18-2-12231-2; (Receipt # 0981-5552384), filed by Oregon Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment 1 - Complaint, #3 Attachment 2 - Service on OIC)(Dinning, Jennifer) Modified on 11/23/2018 (GMR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
