Moore v. Esper
| Edgar L Moore |
| Mark Esper and Mark T Esper |
| 3:2019cv05055 |
| January 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Robert J Bryan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT (Redacted) against defendant Mark T Esper with JURY DEMAND, filed by Edgar L Moore. (Summons(es) not received to issue) (Receipt # TAC015553) (GMR) |
| Filing fee received: $400, receipt number TAC015553. (SP) |
Filing 2
ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Fee due by 3/1/19. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. Paper copy sent to plaintiff at Tacoma address. (JL)
|
| Fee due 3/1/2019. (JL) |
| NOTICE TO FILER: re [1-1] Proposed Complaint. Exhibits to complaint contain personal identifiers that are required to be redacted per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and Local Civil Rule 5.2, and has been administratively sealed. Please file a redacted version of the document as soon as practicable. This will not affect your original filing date. (MET) cc: plaintiff |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Edgar L Moore. (Attachments: SEALED #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (ERA) Modified on 1/18/2019 to seal (MET). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
