Reed et al v. City of Vancouver, Washington et al
| Karen L Reed and Michael F Reed |
| Eric Holmes, Jonathan Young, Bronson Potter and City of Vancouver, Washington |
| 3:2019cv05182 |
| March 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Robert J Bryan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) City of Vancouver (main document), Washington, Eric Holmes, Bronson Potter, Jonathan Young. (Attachments: #1 Summons E. Holmes, #2 Summons B. Potter, #3 Summons J. Young)(GMR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 3:17-cv-05969, by Plaintiffs Karen L Reed, Michael F Reed. (Tracey, Christine) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 3:17-cv-05969, by Plaintiffs Karen L Reed, Michael F Reed. (Tracey, Christine) Stricken on 3/8/2019 per request by counsel: Please see Dkt. #3 (SP). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # 0981-5681337), filed by Karen L Reed, Michael F Reed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, City of Vancouver, WA, #3 Summons, Holmes, #4 Summons, Potter, #5 Summons, Young)(Tracey, Christine) Modified on 3/8/2019 to remove duplicate text only (GMR). |
| Judge Robert J. Bryan added. (GMR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
