Ipock v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
| Douglas Ipock |
| Aetna Life Insurance Company |
| 3:2019cv05622 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ronald B Leighton |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint For Declaratory Relief by Aetna Life Insurance Company.(Swale, Sarah) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Aetna, Inc., Corporate Parent CVS Health Corporation, Corporate Parent CVS Pharmacy, Inc. for Aetna Life Insurance Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Aetna Life Insurance Company (Swale, Sarah) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Sarah E Swale on behalf of Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company. (Swale, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Aetna Life Insurance Company c/o State of Washington Office of the Insurance Commissioner on 7/11/2019, filed by Plaintiff Douglas Ipock. (Crawford, Melton) |
Filing 6
ORDER re #2 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Robert J Rosati for Douglas Ipock, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 10/8/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 9/24/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/1/2019, by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
| Filing 3 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Aetna Life Insurance Company. (KB) |
| Judge Ronald B. Leighton added. (KB) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Robert Rosati FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Douglas Ipock (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-5836463 (Crawford, Melton) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # 0981-5836406) Attorney Melton L Crawford added to party Douglas Ipock(pty:pla), filed by Douglas Ipock. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Crawford, Melton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ipock v. Aetna Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Sarah E Swale |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Douglas Ipock | |
| Represented By: | Melton L Crawford |
| Represented By: | Robert J Rosati |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
