Namock v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Danny Lyle Namock, Jr |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2019cv05887 |
| September 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| David W Christel |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Michael S. Howard on behalf of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Howard, Michael) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Office of the Regional Chief Counsel Region X, US Attorney for Western District of Washington, Attorney General of the US on 10/7/2019, filed by Plaintiff Danny Lyle Namock, Jr. (Parham, Teal) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (ERA) |
| Judge David W. Christel added. (ERA) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT by Plaintiff to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. (KEB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (Receipt # 0981-5934642) Attorney Teal M Parham added to party Danny Lyle Namock, Jr(pty:pla), filed by Danny Lyle Namock, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Parham, Teal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
