Frejek v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Yolanda N Frejek |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2019cv06053 |
| November 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Lars Joseph Nelson on behalf of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Nelson, Lars) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on USAO-WDWA on 11/18/2019, filed by Plaintiff Yolanda N Frejek. (Oliver, David) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by Yolanda N Frejek. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (PM) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (ERA) |
| Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (ERA) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by Yolanda N Frejek. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Oliver, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
