Altair Logix LLC v. Phytec America LLC
Plaintiff: Altair Logix LLC
Defendant: Phytec America LLC
Case Number: 3:2019cv06142
Filed: November 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: J Richard Creatura
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2019 Filing 8 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office (SP)
November 27, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Complaint,. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions. (GT)
November 27, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Phytec America LLC. (GT)
November 27, 2019 NOTICE TO FILER: ***Case Terminated-Incorrect Division*** Civil case number 2:19-cv-1933 has been terminated. The incorrect divisional office was selected by the filer upon case opening. This case has now been assigned a Tacoma case number and Judge. All future filings shall bear the following case number: 3:19-cv-06142-JRC. Before initiating a new case, please review the #Attorney Case Opening Guide (PDF) to determine the correct divisional jurisdiction. (GT)
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re #4 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney David R Bennett for Altair Logix LLC, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
November 26, 2019 Filing 4 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY David R. Bennett FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Altair Logix LLC (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-6027143 (Mann, Philip)
November 26, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action in D. Mass.; N.D. Ca.; D.Del., case number in other court 1:19-cv-11857-HSG; 4:19-cv-3662; 1:19-cv-585 ; filed by Plaintiff Altair Logix LLC. (Mann, Philip)
November 26, 2019 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Altair Logix LLC (Mann, Philip)
November 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Phytec America L.L.C. with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # 0981-6026773) Attorney Philip P Mann added to party Altair Logix LLC(pty:pla), filed by Altair Logix LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120), #4 Summons)(Mann, Philip)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Altair Logix LLC v. Phytec America LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Altair Logix LLC
Represented By: David R Bennett
Represented By: Philip P Mann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phytec America LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?