May v. Pierce County
| Clarence May |
| Pierce County |
| 3:2019cv06167 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ronald B Leighton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER denying #7 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
| Filing 13 REPLY, filed by Defendant Pierce County, TO RESPONSE to #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Hamilton, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Clarence May, to #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Adams, Mark) |
| Filing 11 REPLY, filed by Plaintiff Clarence May, TO RESPONSE to #7 MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Appendix A - Warrant of Abatement)(Adams, Mark) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE, by Defendant Pierce County, to #7 MOTION to Remand . (Hamilton, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant Pierce County. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 1/10/2020, (Hamilton, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 Proposed MOTION for Order Remand, filed by Plaintiff Clarence May. Noting Date 1/3/2020, (Adams, Mark) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand , filed by Plaintiff Clarence May. Noting Date 1/3/2020, (Adams, Mark) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 3/9/2020, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 2/24/2020, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 3/2/2020, by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Kitsap County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (ERA) |
| Judge Ronald B. Leighton added. (ERA) |
| Filing 3 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant Pierce County (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Records)(Hamilton, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Kitsap County Superior Court, case number 19-2-03091-18, filed by Pierce County. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint , #3 Exhibit B - Summons)(Hamilton, Daniel) (Receipt # 0981-6038579) Modified on 12/6/2019 to add receipt number (ERA). |
| Filing 1 STRICKEN PER COUNSEL'S REQUEST, TO BE REFILED VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant Pierce County (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Records)(Hamilton, Daniel) Modified on 12/5/2019 (ERA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: May v. Pierce County | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pierce County | |
| Represented By: | Daniel R. Hamilton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Clarence May | |
| Represented By: | Mark Harris Adams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
