Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Tanya Harris and Tanya L Harris
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2020cv05101
Filed: February 5, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Michelle L Peterson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE: Plaintiff Tanya L Harris has registered to electronically file and receive electronic service in this case. (STP)
March 7, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Benjamin J. Groebner on behalf of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Groebner, Benjamin)
March 5, 2020 Filing 7 CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge per #5 Declination of Consent form. Case remains assigned to Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (cc: T. Harris) (KMP)
February 7, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security. (TF) emailed to USA
February 7, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge if this form is not returned by 2/28/2020. Please Note: Forms must not be electronically filed with the Court. (TF) cc: T. Harris
February 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. Documents served electronically to Commissioner of Social Security on 2/7/2020. (TF) cc: T. Harris
February 7, 2020 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by Tanya Harris.(TF)
February 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (TF) cc: T. Harris
February 5, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Tanya Harris. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint)(GMR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Kerry Jane Keefe
Represented By: Benjamin J. Groebner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya L Harris
Represented By: Tanya L Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?