Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security
| 3:2020cv05499 |
| June 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER'S FINAL DECISION AND DISMISSING THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (MW)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting Defendant's 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall have up to and including 9/25/2020, to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint, including the certified administrative record. The certified administrative record shall be filed within ten days of its availability to the Office of the General Counsel, if it can be filed earlier than the aforementioned date. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (LH)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis: Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this order to pay the full filing fee or reapply to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones.(MW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
