Stockmoe v. Kitsap Mental Health Services
| Tina Stockmoe |
| Kitsap Mental Health Services |
| 3:2020cv05936 |
| September 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Robert J Bryan |
| Michelle L Peterson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 203 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Kitsap Mental Health Services with JURY DEMAND, filed by Tina Stockmoe.(Thal, Spencer) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE of Summons upon defendant Kitsap Mental Health Services mailed on 10/13/2020 (Nelson, Tamara) |
Filing 9
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 12/21/2020, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/28/2020, Joint Status Report due by 1/4/2021. Authorized by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS. Authorized by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)
|
| REFERRING JSR due (Motion calendar tracking event only) to: Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL) |
| JSR due 1/4/2021. (JL) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Clerk William M McCool. Case reassigned to Judge Robert J. Bryan and referred to Hon. Michelle L. Peterson pursuant to Local Rule MJR 6 and Amended General Order 02-19. (KMP) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Zachariah Nathan William Thal on behalf of Plaintiff Tina Stockmoe. (Thal, Zachariah) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge if this form is not returned by 10/2/2020. Please Note: Forms must not be electronically filed with the Court. (KMP) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Tamara Kristine Nelson on behalf of Defendant Kitsap Mental Health Services. (Nelson, Tamara) |
| Filing 3 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Kitsap Mental Health Services. (ERA) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Complaint. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions. (ERA) |
| Hon. Michelle L. Peterson added. (ERA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Kitsap Mental Health Services with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-6609886), filed by Tina Stockmoe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Thal, Spencer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stockmoe v. Kitsap Mental Health Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kitsap Mental Health Services | |
| Represented By: | Tamara Kristine Nelson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tina Stockmoe | |
| Represented By: | Spencer Nathan Thal |
| Represented By: | Zachariah Nathan William Thal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
