Smith v. Aldridge et al
| John Garrett Smith |
| Rotha Yong, Olga Dacy, Ly Yong and Sandra Aldridge |
| 3:2020cv06117 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Theresa L Fricke |
| Benjamin H Settle |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Alternative Service by Mail, filed by Petitioner John Garrett Smith. Noted by clerk for: 12/4/2020. **1 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(John Smith, Prisoner ID: 351176)(GMR) |
| Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus, filed by John Garrett Smith.**60 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(John Smith, Prisoner ID: 351176)(GMR) |
| Filing fee received: $5.00, Receipt Number TAC016529. **0 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(John Smith, Prisoner ID: 351176)(SP) |
| Filing 2 LETTER sent re IFP deficiency: - The filing fee requirement must be met. Please submit either the full $5.00 filing fee or an application for In Forma Pauperis (IFP) status. Filer has until 12/16/2020 to correct. **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(John Smith, Prisoner ID: 351176)(SP) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/16/2020: #1 Habeas IFP Form (blank)) (SP). |
| Filing 1 PROPOSED Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Petitioner John Garrett Smith (Attachments: #1 Proposed Motion for Alternative Service by Mail)**61 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(John Smith, Prisoner ID: 351176)(SP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
