Harris v. Haynes
Mr. Darrel L Harris and Darrel Lorne Harris |
Mr. Ron Haynes and Ron Haynes |
3:2020cv06167 |
November 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
John C Coughenour |
Mary Alice Theiler |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , filed by Respondent Ron Haynes. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 1/29/2021, (Kostin, Alex) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Alex A Kostin on behalf of Respondent Ron Haynes. (Kostin, Alex) |
Filing 2 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND ANSWER, #1 2254 PETITION by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. Documents served electronically to Ron Haynes on 12/10/2020. Within forty-five (45 days) after service, respondent shall file an answer and note it on the fourth Friday after filing. Petitioner may file a response not later than the Monday immediately preceding the Friday designated for consideration of the matter. Respondent may file a reply not later than the Friday designated for consideration of the matter. (ST) |
U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour and Hon. Mary Alice Theiler added. (SP) |
Filing 1 2254 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # AWAWDC-6772432), filed by Darrel L Harris.(Dixon, James) Modified on 12/10/2020 to add type of petition. (ST) (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/10/2020 w/case number) (ST). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.