Knox v. White
| Bradley David Knox |
| Daniel W White |
| 3:2021cv05272 |
| April 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Brian A Tsuchida |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 DECLARATION of Bradley Knox re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Petitioner Bradley David Knox (Fox, Neil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney John Joseph Samson on behalf of Respondent Daniel W White. (Samson, John) |
| Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT (Green Card) re service by certified mail executed upon Daniel W White. (SR) Modified on 5/7/2021 to correct filing date (SR). |
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #7 Return Receipt (Green Card): Filed date has been corrected. (SR) |
| Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT (Green Card) re service by certified mail executed upon Attorney General's Office. (PM) |
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE AND ANSWER, 2254 PETITION, by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. The Clerk shall serve both 2254 Petitions and all supporting documents filed in this instant case and 21-cv-5273-RSM-BAT, as well as a copy of this Order. Served by Certified Mail on 4/28/2021 to Daniel W White; Attorney General of the State of Washington. (ST)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 STIPULATED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES, signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. All future filings shall bear case number 21-cv-5272-RSM-BAT. Magistrate Judge Michelle Peterson is no longer assigned to case number 21-cv-5273. (ST)
|
| NOTE re #2 Stipulated Motion to Consolidate Cases. The appearance of attorney Paul D. Weisser is not proper, and notices of electronic filing will not be sent until corrected. Signatures must be in accordance with FRCP 11 and LCR 83.2(a) and must comply with #ECF Filing Procedures. (PM) cc: Paul Weisser via ECF ad hoc |
| Case reassigned to Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (ST) |
| Filing 2 Stipulated MOTION to consolidate cases, filed by Petitioner Bradley David Knox. Noting Date 4/19/2021, (Fox, Neil) |
| Judge Marsha J. Pechman and Hon. Brian A Tsuchida added. (SP) |
| Filing 1 2254 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # AWAWDC-7043775), filed by Bradley David Knox. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Petition, #2 Exhibits , #3 Original Exhibits in Support of Petition)(Fox, Neil) Modified on 4/19/2021 to identify Memorandum in Support of Writ incorrectly filed as an attachment. (SP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Knox v. White | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Daniel W White | |
| Represented By: | John Joseph Samson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Bradley David Knox | |
| Represented By: | Neil Martin Fox |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
