Williams v. Sinclair et al
| James Anthony Williams |
| Mullins, Andersen, Lugo, Cytonovich, Johnson Booth, Harvey, Delgado, Fishbeck, Brown, Archer, McDole, Haven, Karie Rainer, Savantez, Ron Benjimin, Cisneros, Anderson, Mullens, Flores, Melton, Jon W Coers, Thompson, Stephen Sinclair, Garcia-Martinez, Wilson, Aldo Munoz, Michel, Tim Thrasher, Ureno, Wise, Kent, J Knittel, Department of Corrections Chief of Psychiatry, Department of Corrections Chief Psychologist, Brewer, Dagger and Cody Doe |
| 3:2021cv05347 |
| May 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Brian A Tsuchida |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT BY COURT in favor of Andersen, Archer, Brewer, Brown, Cisneros, Cytonovich, Dagger, Delgado, Department of Corrections Chief Psychologist, Department of Corrections Chief of Psychiatry, Fishbeck, Flores, Garcia-Martinez, Harvey, Haven, Kent, Lugo, McDole, Melton, Michel, Mullins, Savantez, Thompson, Ureno, Wilson, Wise, Aldo Munoz, Cody Doe, J Knittel, Johnson Booth, Jon W Coers, Karie Rainer, Ron Benjimin, Stephen Sinclair, Tim Thrasher against James Anthony Williams. **1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(James Williams, Prisoner ID: 740600)(ST) |
| ***Deadlines/Hearings terminated. **DO NOT PRINT**(James Williams, Prisoner ID: 740600)(ST) |
Filing 5
ORDER ADOPTING #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. The #1 IFP Application is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee within 30 days. If the filing fee is not paid, the case shall be dismissed and closed. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(James Williams, Prisoner ID: 740600)(ST)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines : Filing fee due by 7/1/2021 **DO NOT PRINT**(James Williams, Prisoner ID: 740600)(ST) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. Objections to R&R due by 5/26/2021; Noting Date 5/28/2021. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED Order Denying IFP Application, #2 PROPOSED Judgment)**5 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(James Williams, Prisoner ID: 740600)(ST) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Prison Trust Account Statement.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 6/11/2021 to correct. **1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(James Williams, Prisoner ID: 740600)(ST) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff James Anthony Williams. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint) **69 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(James Williams, Prisoner ID: 740600) (ST) Modified on 5/12/2021. Regenerated notice to plaintiff -- PEF flag added. (ST) |
| NOTICE TO FILER re #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PRISONER E-FILING INITIATIVE. The Western District of Washington received documents from you for filing through the U.S. Postal Service. Pursuant to General Order 06-16, participation in the Prisoner E-Filing Initiative is mandatory for all prisoner litigants incarcerated at the Washington State Penitentiary. These documents will be filed by the clerk in this instance, it is not necessary to refile. Please comply by submitting all future documents to be filed with this Court to the Law Librarian/designee for electronic filing. **0 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(James Williams, Prisoner ID: 740600)(ST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
