Silva v. Zaragoza
| Ramon Saul Silva, Jr and Badboy |
| Rogelio Zaragoza |
| 3:2021cv05444 |
| June 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Theresa L Fricke |
| Benjamin H Settle |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 OBJECTIONS by Plaintiff Ramon Saul Silva, Jr to #4 Report and Recommendations. Noted by clerk for 8/13/2021. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Ramon Silva, Prisoner ID: 326609)(KMC) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED Motion for Court to Direct Service, filed by Plaintiff Ramon Saul Silva, Jr. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Ramon Silva, Prisoner ID: 326609)(KMC) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge Theresa L Fricke re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Ramon Saul Silva, Jr. Noted for 8/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)**7 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Ramon Silva, Prisoner ID: 326609)(KMC) |
| Filing 2 LETTER sent to Plaintiff re case number and Judge assignment. **1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Ramon Silva, Prisoner ID: 326609)(KMC) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Ramon Saul Silva, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint)**66 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Ramon Silva, Prisoner ID: 326609)(KMC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
