JUUL Labs Inc v. Sudhar Corporation
| JUUL Labs Inc |
| Sudhar Corporation |
| 3:2021cv05549 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Benjamin H Settle |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as to Defendant Sudhar Corporation. Answer due 9/29/2021. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MGC)
|
| Filing 7 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer, filed by Plaintiff JUUL Labs Inc. Noting Date 9/8/2021, (Coates, Stephen) Modified additional motion information on 9/9/2021 (AMD). |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Sudhar Corporation on 8/18/2021, filed by Plaintiff JUUL Labs Inc. (Coates, Stephen) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, DISCOVERY, DEPOSITIONS AND EARLY SETTLEMENT: Joint Status Report due by 11/3/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 10/20/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/27/2021. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MGC)
|
| Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office (SG) |
| Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Sudhar Corporation (SG) |
| NOTICE TO FILER: ***Case Terminated-Incorrect Division*** Civil case number 2:21-CV-1010 has been terminated. The incorrect divisional office was selected by the filer upon case opening. This case has now been assigned a Tacoma case number. All future filings shall bear the following case number: 3:21-CV-5549-BHS. Before initiating a new case, please review the #Attorney Case Opening Guide (PDF) to determine the correct divisional jurisdiction. (SG) |
| Filing 2 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS by Plaintiff JUUL Labs Inc (Coates, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) SUDHAR CORPORATION (Receipt # AWAWDC-7186314) Attorney Stephen Jadie Coates added to party JUUL Labs Inc(pty:pla), filed by JUUL Labs Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Corporate Disclosure Statement - Altria Group Inc added, #3 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120) AO 120 Form, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E)(Coates, Stephen) Modified on 8/2/2021-remove extra language (SG). Modified on 8/3/2021 to reflect corporate parent(MET). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JUUL Labs Inc v. Sudhar Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JUUL Labs Inc | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Jadie Coates |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sudhar Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
