Del Vecchio v. Weatherguard Roofing Inc
| Anthony Del Vecchio |
| Weatherguard Roofing Inc and Weatherguard, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv05580 |
| August 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Barbara J Rothstein |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Rachel G Marshall on behalf of Defendant Weatherguard, Inc.. (Marshall, Rachel) |
Filing 16
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 11/3/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 10/20/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/27/2021. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint, by Weatherguard Roofing Inc, Weatherguard, Inc..(Slade, Victoria) Modified on 9/22/2021 to strike out name of terminated party (SR). |
|
Filing 14
ORDER re the Parties' #13 Stipulated Motion to Extend Answer Deadline. The deadline to file an Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended from Tuesday, September 7, 2021, to Tuesday, September 21, 2021. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (PM)
|
| Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION TO EXTEND ANSWER DEADLINE, filed by Defendant Weatherguard, Inc.. (Slade, Victoria) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #9 Notice of Appearance. ***Action Required*** Attorney Admission.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (SR) |
| Attorney Gillian Murphy added for Weatherguard, Inc.; per #9 Notice of Appearance. (SR) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Gregory M Skidmore on behalf of Plaintiff Anthony Del Vecchio. (Skidmore, Gregory) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Damien N Villarreal on behalf of Plaintiff Anthony Del Vecchio. (Villarreal, Damien) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Victoria Slade on behalf of Defendant Weatherguard, Inc.. (Slade, Victoria) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
|
| Filing 7 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Weatherguard, Inc. (SR) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #5 Amended Complaint ; filed by Plaintiff Anthony Del Vecchio. (Fomina, Vera) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Weatherguard, Inc. with JURY DEMAND, filed by Anthony Del Vecchio. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fomina, Vera) (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/17/2021 to flatten malformed PDF) (KB). |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Anthony Del Vecchio (Fomina, Vera) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s), Jury Demand Improperly Indicated.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (SP) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Weatherguard Roofing Inc. (SP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Weatherguard Roofing, Inc. with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7207373), filed by Anthony Del Vecchio. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fomina, Vera) |
| Judge Barbara J. Rothstein added. (SP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
