Deardorff v. Bentley Properties LTD
Plaintiff: Kalee Deardorff
Defendant: Bentley Properties, LTD and Bentley Properties LTD
Case Number: 3:2021cv05620
Filed: August 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Barbara J Rothstein
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re #6 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Manuel Hiraldo for plaintiff Kalee Deardorff, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
October 14, 2021 Filing 6 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Manuel S. Hiraldo FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Kalee Deardorff (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7292175 (Rubel, Kira)
September 30, 2021 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Justin D Park added to party Bentley Properties LTD(pty:dft) by Bentley Properties LTD.(Park, Justin)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 11/3/2021, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 10/20/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/27/2021. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (GC)
August 30, 2021 Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Bentley Properties LTD. (SP)
August 30, 2021 Judge Barbara J. Rothstein added. (SP)
August 26, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Bentley Properties, LTD with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7225430) Attorney Kira M. Rubel added to party Kalee Deardorff(pty:pla), filed by Kalee Deardorff. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rubel, Kira)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deardorff v. Bentley Properties LTD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kalee Deardorff
Represented By: Kira M. Rubel
Represented By: Manuel Hiraldo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bentley Properties, LTD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bentley Properties LTD
Represented By: Justin D Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?