Ritch et al v. American Honda Motor Co Inc
| Stacy Ritch and Gellert Dornay |
| American Honda Motor Co Inc |
| 3:2021cv05706 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| David G Estudillo |
| Michelle L Peterson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant American Honda Motor Co Inc. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 12/10/2021, (Reynolds, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 20
AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) American Honda Motor Co Inc with JURY DEMAND, filed by Stacy Ritch, Gellert Dornay.(Ard, Joel)
|
|
Filing 19
MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE to Hon. David G. Estudillo for all further proceedings. Judge Benjamin H. Settle no longer assigned to case. As directed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MGC)
|
|
Filing 18
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant American Honda Motor Co Inc. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 11/19/2021, (Reynolds, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER re #14 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Eric Kizirian for defendant American Honda Motor Co Inc, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, DISCOVERY, DEPOSITIONS AND EARLY SETTLEMENT: Joint Status Report due by 1/3/2022, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 12/20/2021, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/27/2021. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MGC)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER re #13 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney William R Restis for Plaintiffs Gellert Dornay, and Stacy Ritch, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
|
|
Filing 14
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Eric Y. Kizirian FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant American Honda Motor Co Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7278046 (Reynolds, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 13
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY William R. Restis FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiffs Gellert Dornay, Stacy Ritch (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7278034 (Ard, Joel)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER ON #11 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (AMD)
|
|
Filing 11
Stipulated MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS, filed by Defendant American Honda Motor Co Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 9/28/2021, (Reynolds, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Benjamin H. Settle for all further proceedings. Judge Robert J. Bryan no longer assigned to case by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (TC)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. Case reassigned to Judge Robert J. Bryan for all further proceedings. Hon. Michelle L. Peterson no longer assigned to case. (TF)
|
|
Filing 8
DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiffs Gellert Dornay, Stacy Ritch (Ard, Joel)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Related Case(s) 3:21-cv-05646; 3:21-cv-05666; 3:21-cv-05708, by Plaintiffs Gellert Dornay, Stacy Ritch. (Ard, Joel)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge if this form is not returned by 10/4/2021. Please Note: Forms must not be electronically filed with the Court. (TF)
|
|
Filing 5
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Honda Motor Co., Ltd. for American Honda Motor Co Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by American Honda Motor Co Inc (Reynolds, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 4
DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Defendant American Honda Motor Co Inc (Reynolds, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal,. ***Action Required*** Notice of Removal - Jury Demand Improperly Submitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (AMD)
|
|
Filing 2
LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Thurston County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (AMD)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Thurston County Superior Court, case number 21-2-01370-34; (Receipt # AWAWDC-7265179), filed by American Honda Motor Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Exhibit Summons, #4 Exhibit Case Information Sheet, #5 Exhibit Notice of Assignment and Notice of Trial Setting Date)(Reynolds, Rachel)
|
|
Hon. Michelle L. Peterson added. (AMD)
|
|
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Defendant must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 10/1/2021. (AMD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
