Waste Action Project v. Associated Petroleum Products Inc
Waste Action Project |
Associated Petroleum Products, Inc. and Associated Petroleum Products Inc |
3:2021cv05895 |
December 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Benjamin H Settle |
Environmental Matters |
33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Waste Action Project (Rose, Savannah) |
Filing 3 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, DISCOVERY, DEPOSITIONS AND EARLY SETTLEMENT, by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. Joint Status Report due by 3/15/2022, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 3/1/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 3/8/2022. (DK) |
Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Associated Petroleum Products Inc. (AMD) |
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 12/21/2021. (AMD) |
Judge Benjamin H. Settle added. (AMD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Associated Petroleum Products, Inc. (Receipt # AWAWDC-7366649), filed by Waste Action Project. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Rose, Savannah) (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/15/2021 to flatten malformed PDF) (KB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.