Jones v. Pierce County Jail et al
Plaintiff: Derrick Quinn Jones
Defendant: Pierce County Jail, Records Department and Jonathon Slothower
Case Number: 3:2022cv05049
Filed: January 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: David W Christel
Referring Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2022 Filing 8 JUDGMENT BY COURT in favor of Pierce County Jail, Records Department, Jonathon Slothower against Derrick Quinn Jones. (cc: plaintiff via USPS) (ST)
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. Plaintiff's #6 Objections to the #5 Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED. Plaintiff's #1 Proposed 1983 Complaint is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's #4 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED as moot. This dismissal counts as a STRIKE under 42 U.S.C. 1915(g). (cc: plaintiff via USPS) (ST)
February 28, 2022 Filing 6 OBJECTIONS to #5 Report and Recommendations, by Plaintiff Derrick Quinn Jones. Noting Date 3/18/2022. (ST)
February 16, 2022 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge David W. Christel, re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this Report to file written objections. This matter is set for consideration on 3/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Judgment)(AMD - cc: pltf)
February 7, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Derrick Quinn Jones.(AMD)
January 24, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Proposed 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. ***Action Required*** 1983 Filing Fee Not Paid.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 2/23/2022 to correct IFP application (Attachments: #1 IFP Forms) (AMD - cc: pltf)
January 20, 2022 Filing 1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Plaintiff Derrick Quinn Jones. (NO FILING FEE/NO IFP RECEIVED) (AMD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Pierce County Jail et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derrick Quinn Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pierce County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Records Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jonathon Slothower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?