Burke v. Commissioner of Social Security
William Burke |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
3:2022cv05160 |
March 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Michelle L Peterson |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jacob P Phillips on behalf of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Phillips, Jacob) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on on 3/30/2022, filed by Plaintiff William Burke. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Martinez, Janet) |
Filing 5 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (AQ) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by William Burke. (AQ) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (AQ) |
Filing 2 CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Case remains assigned to Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (TF) |
Hon. Michelle L. Peterson added. (AMD) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by William Burke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons)(Martinez, Janet) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.