McFarland v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Robert McFarland |
| Acting Commissioner of the Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2022cv05365 |
| May 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| J Richard Creatura |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Plaintiff Robert McFarland (Warrick, Inga) |
Filing 4
ORDER NOT TO PROVIDE COURTESY COPIES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD: The Administration should not file a paper or CD courtesy copy of the Administrative Record for chambers in this matter. This does not modify the procedure for any other chambers. Signed by Judge J Richard Creatura. (KAM)
|
| Filing 3 CONSENT filed by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. (KAM) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (ZMG) |
| Judge J Richard Creatura added. (ZMG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Acting Commissioner of the Social Security (Receipt # AWAWDC-7560313) Attorney Inga Warrick added to party Robert McFarland(pty:pla), filed by Robert McFarland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Warrick, Inga) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
