Nance v. Commissioner of Social Security
Mary Rosalie Nance |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
3:2022cv05479 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Theresa L Fricke |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(GMR) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT against defendant Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Mary Rosalie Nance. (GMR) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Judge Theresa L Fricke. (GMR) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET ; filed by Plaintiff Mary Rosalie Nance. (Win, M) |
Filing 3 CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. (GMR) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. ***Action Required*** Civil Cover Sheet Omitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (AMD) |
Judge Theresa L Fricke added. (AMD) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by Mary Rosalie Nance. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Win, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.