Martinez v. Government Employees Insurance Company
| Luis Uzcategui Martinez |
| Government Employees Insurance Company dba Geico and Government Employees Insurance Company doing business as GEICO |
| 3:2022cv05503 |
| July 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Benjamin H Settle |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE, by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company, to #10 MOTION to Remand. (Attachments: #1 Declaration ISO Stipulated Motion)(Barger, Glenn) |
| Noting Date Reset by Clerk to 8/12/2022 re #10 MOTION to Remand. (AMD) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Hearing re #10 MOTION to Remand ; filed by Plaintiff Luis Uzcategui Martinez. (Harlan, Beau) |
| Filing 12 DECLARATION of Beau D. Harlan filed by Plaintiff Luis Uzcategui Martinez re #10 MOTION to Remand (Harlan, Beau) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM filed by Plaintiff Luis Uzcategui Martinez re #10 MOTION to Remand (Harlan, Beau) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand, filed by Plaintiff Luis Uzcategui Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) Noting Date 8/12/2022 8/5/2022. (Harlan, Beau) Modified on 7/29/2022 (AMD). |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent GEICO Corporation, Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. for Government Employees Insurance Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Government Employees Insurance Company (Barger, Glenn) |
Filing 8
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, DISCOVERY, DEPOSITIONS AND EARLY SETTLEMENT. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 10/3/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/11/2022, Joint Status Report due by 10/17/2022. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MET)
|
| Filing 7 PRAECIPE to attach document (Corrected Signature Page) re #4 Praecipe to Attach Document by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company dba Geico (Barger, Glenn) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal, #4 Praecipe to Attach Document. ***Action Required*** Improper Signature, Attorney Admission.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (ZMG) |
| Filing 5 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Clark County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (ZMG) |
| NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Defendant(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 7/22/2022. (ZMG) |
| Judge Benjamin H. Settle added. (ZMG) |
| Filing 4 PRAECIPE to attach document re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company dba Geico (Barger, Glenn) |
| Filing 3 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company dba Geico (Barger, Glenn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET ; filed by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company dba Geico. (Barger, Glenn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Clark County Superior Court, case number 22-2-01360-06; (Receipt # AWAWDC-7625615) Attorney Glenn Earle Barger added to party Government Employees Insurance Company dba Geico(pty:dft), filed by Government Employees Insurance Company dba Geico.(Barger, Glenn) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/18/2022) (CDA). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/18/2022: #1 Complaint) (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
