Bonds v. Piland et al
| Ezekiel Traivon Bonds |
| Timothy Piland, Jethra Houn and Lashyla Hartman |
| 3:2022cv05522 |
| July 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Theresa L Fricke |
| Richard A Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is ordered, on or before 9/16/2022, to show cause as to why this Court should not recommend his IFP application be denied. Signed by Judge Theresa L Fricke. (MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER re #1 Application filed by Ezekiel Traivon Bonds. (AMD) |
| Filing 4 Prison Trust Account Statement filed by Ezekiel Traivon Bonds. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AMD) |
| REFERRING #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to Magistrate Judge Theresa L Fricke. (AMD) |
| IFP deficiency corrected re #4 Prison Trust Account Statement. (AMD) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Application. ***Action Required*** Prison Trust Account Statement.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 8/19/2022 to correct IFP application. (SP- cc: plaintiff) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Plaintiff Ezekiel Traivon Bonds. (Attachments: #1 Proposed 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint)(SP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
