Souza v. Pierce County Superior Court
| Marlin Keone Souza and Marlin Keone Tachera |
| Pierce County Superior Court |
| 3:2022cv05545 |
| July 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Theresa L Fricke |
| Barbara J Rothstein |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Marlin Keone Souza. (Attachments: #1 Trust account statement)(ZMG) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #3 Application. ***Action Required*** Prison Trust Account Statement.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 9/8/2022 to correct IFP application (AMD) cc: pltf |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Marlin Keone Souza. (AMD) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Application. ***Action Required*** Incorrect IFP Form, Prison Trust Account Statement.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 8/29/2022 to correct IFP application (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (AMD) cc: pltf |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Marlin Keone Souza. (Attachments: #1 Proposed 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Mailing Envelope)(AMD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
