Barton v. Sun Life and Health Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Scott Barton
Defendant: Sun Life and Health Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2022cv05573
Filed: August 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: David G Estudillo
Referring Judge: David G Estudillo
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer: Sun Life and Health Insurance Company answer due 10/10/2022. Signed by U.S. District Judge David G. Estudillo. (MGC)
September 6, 2022 Filing 6 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Sun Life and Health Insurance Company on 8/12/2022 (Tucker, Stacy)
September 2, 2022 Filing 5 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , filed by Defendant Sun Life and Health Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 9/2/2022, (Buhite, Russell)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, DISCOVERY, DEPOSITIONS AND EARLY SETTLEMENT: FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 11/14/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 11/21/2022, Joint Status Report due by 11/28/2022, Scheduling Conference set for 12/2/2022 at 11:30 AM via Zoom before U.S. District Judge David G. Estudillo. Signed by U.S. District Judge David G. Estudillo. (MGC)
August 29, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Russell Scott Buhite on behalf of Defendant Sun Life and Health Insurance Company. (Buhite, Russell)
August 9, 2022 Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Sun Life and Health Insurance Company (ST)
August 9, 2022 Case assigned to Judge David G. Estudillo. (ST)
August 9, 2022 NOTICE TO FILER: ***Case Terminated-Incorrect Division*** Civil case number 22-cv-1109 has been terminated. The incorrect divisional office was selected by the filer upon case opening. This case has now been assigned a Tacoma case number. All future filings shall bear the following case number and Judge assignment: 22-cv-5573-DGE. Before initiating a new case, please review the #Attorney Case Opening Guide (PDF) to determine the correct divisional jurisdiction. (ST)
August 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Sun Life and Health Insurance Company (US) (Receipt # AWAWDC-7657879) Attorney Stacy Monahan Tucker added to party Scott Barton(pty:pla), filed by Scott Barton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons as to Sun Life and Health Insurance Company)(Tucker, Stacy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barton v. Sun Life and Health Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Barton
Represented By: Stacy Monahan Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sun Life and Health Insurance Company
Represented By: Russell Scott Buhite
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?