Peterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Dominic Peterson and Dominic R Peterson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2022cv05723 |
| September 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John H Chun |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons 2, #2 Summons 3) (SB) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (Summons(es) as provided by plaintiff to be electronically issued) (IFP Granted) filed by Dominic R Peterson. (SB) |
Filing 2
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall be issued summonses. Plaintiff is responsible for serving the complaint and summonses, and must file proof of service as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by Dominic Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Oliver, David) |
| Judge John H. Chun added. (TE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
