Jacobs v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Kristine Jacobs |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2022cv05884 |
| November 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Mary Alice Theiler |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on on 1/12/2023, filed by Plaintiff Kristine Jacobs. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Chhagan, Victoria) |
| Filing 5 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (SNP) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by Kristine Jacobs. (SNP) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(SNP)
|
| Filing 2 CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Case remains assigned to Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (SNP) |
| Hon. Mary Alice Theiler added. (TE) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by Kristine Jacobs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons)(Chhagan, Victoria) (Attachment 1 & 3 replaced due to malformed pdf on 11/16/2022) (TE). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
