Flores v. State of Washington et al
Sarai Flores |
State of Washington, Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts and Superior Court of Washington County of Pierce |
3:2022cv06000 |
December 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Tana Lin |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of case by Plaintiff Sarai Flores (Flores, Sarai) |
***Civil Case Terminated pursuant to Rule 41 per the filing of Plaintiff's #5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (SB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE: Plaintiff Sarai Flores has registered to electronically file and receive electronic service in this case. (STP) |
Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) All Defendants. Sent via USPS. (MJV) |
Filing 2 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. Sent to plaintiff via USPS (MJV) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) State of Washington, Superior Court of Washington County of Pierce, Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts (Summons(es) issued) (Receipt # T300000139), filed by Sarai Flores. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons, #4 Email Transmittal)(MJV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.