Tran v. Hagensen
Plaintiff: Tam Tran
Defendant: John P Hagensen
Case Number: 3:2023cv05150
Filed: February 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Tana Lin
Referring Judge: Benjamin H Settle
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENTER BAR ORDER AGAINST VEXATIOUS LITIGANT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Tran is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the preceding pre-filing bar order should not be entered against him, in writing, within 30 days. If Tran fails to file a timely response to this notice and order, the Clerk shall open a miscellaneous case and enter the pre-filing bar order, regardless of further filings. This notice and the proposed bar order shall have no effect on cases already pending in this Court. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (AMD - cc: Pltf via USPS)
March 31, 2023 Filing 7 JUDGMENT BY COURT: This case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend.(AMD) cc: Pltf via USPS
March 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, Dkt. #5 . Trans's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and the matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend. Furthermore, Tran's practice of filing repetitive, facially frivolous complaints, seeking to proceed in forma pauperis, and refusing to amend his complaint is abusive and vexatious. If he continues to do so, he may be subject to a bar order, precluding him from filing additional cases in this District without prior court approval. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (AMD) cc: Pltf via USPS
March 9, 2023 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The undersigned recommends Tran's Application to Proceed IFP (Dkt. #1 ) be denied, this case be dismissed without prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim, and any IFP status on appeal be denied without prejudice to Tran to file with the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals an application to proceed IFP. The Clerk is directed to set the matter for consideration on 3/24/2023. Signed by Judge David W. Christel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Judgment)(MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
March 3, 2023 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Benjamin H. Settle for all further proceedings. Judge Tana Lin no longer assigned to case. (AMD)
February 24, 2023 Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. filed by Tam Tran cc: Plaintiff via USPS to corrected Vancouver, WA address. (CR)
February 24, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Tam Tran. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A - Order Dismissing Petition) (CR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tran v. Hagensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tam Tran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John P Hagensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?