Hayden v. Farrell et al
| Kellon J. Hayden and Kellon Hayden |
| Michael Farrell, MD Jane Doe, Hertz Vehicles Llc, Lyft, Inc., Jane Doe Farrell and Lyft Inc |
| 3:2023cv05168 |
| March 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| David G Estudillo |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle ( |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, DISCOVERY, DEPOSITIONS AND EARLY SETTLEMENT: FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 6/27/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/5/2023, Joint Status Report due by 7/11/2023, Scheduling Conference set for 7/14/2023 at 9:00 AM via Zoom before U.S. District Judge David G. Estudillo. Signed by U.S. District Judge David G. Estudillo. (MGC)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Matthew G Stamper on behalf of Plaintiff Kellon Hayden. (Stamper, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Lyft Inc. (Spajic, Robert) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) re: #1 Notice of Removal,, with JURY DEMAND and Affirmative Defenses by Lyft Inc.(Spajic, Robert) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. for Hertz Vehicles LLC. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Hertz Vehicles LLC. (Steinmark, Frank) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Frank Steinmark on behalf of Defendant Hertz Vehicles LLC. (Steinmark, Frank) |
| NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1), Defendants Lift and Hertz must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 3/13/2023. If applicable, a Diversity Disclosure Statement may be required pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(2). In order to properly notify the Court, use the event Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement located in CM/ECF under Other Filings, Other Documents.(CDA) |
| Filing 4 PRAECIPE re #1 Notice of Removal,, Corrected by Defendants Jane Doe Farrell, Michael Farrell (Attachments: #1 Supplement Corrected Notice of Removal)(Wilson, Clifford) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Pierce County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. JURY DEMAND - properly submitted state court jury demand on file (AMD) cc: Counsel Shane Y. Rooney via USPS |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal. ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s), Attorney Admission.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (AMD) cc: Counsel Shane Y. Rooney via USPS |
| U.S. District Judge David G Estudillo added. (AMD) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court JURY DEMAND by Defendant attached as separate document; from Pierce County Superior Court, case number 23-2-04168-8; (Receipt # AWAWDC-7911354) Attorney Clifford J. Wilson added to party Jane Doe(pty:dft), Attorney Clifford J. Wilson added to party Michael Farrell(pty:dft) filed by Jane Doe, Michael Farrell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Amended Complaint Exhibit 1 - Operative Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 - Affidavit of Service on Farrell, #4 Exhibit 3 - Confirmation of Service, #5 Jury Demand Exhibit 4 - Request for Jury Trial)(Wilson, Clifford) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
