Moore v. Effectual Inc
Plaintiff: Jason Moore
Defendant: Effectual Inc
Case Number: 3:2023cv05210
Filed: March 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: David G Estudillo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER - The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, United States District Judge David G. Estudillo: The Court, having reviewed the record, STRIKES Plaintiff's objections to removal (Dkt. No. #11 ) for failure to comply with the local civil rules. Plaintiff's "objections" are not a proper motion to remand and were not properly noted in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7(d). Plaintiff is directed to file a formal motion to remand no later than 5/22/2023, if Plaintiff believes the Court lacks jurisdiction. The foregoing Minute Order authorized by THE HONORABLE DAVID G. ESTUDILLO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.(AMD)
April 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 RESPONSE by Defendant Effectual Inc re #11 Objections to Removal (Pankratz, Adam)
April 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, DISCOVERY, DEPOSITIONS AND EARLY SETTLEMENT: FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 6/27/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/5/2023, Joint Status Report due by 7/11/2023, Scheduling Conference set for 7/14/2023 at 9:30 AM via Zoom before U.S. District Judge David G. Estudillo. Signed by U.S. District Judge David G. Estudillo. (MGC)
April 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 **STRICKEN per #14 Minute Order** OBJECTIONS TO REMOVAL by Plaintiff Jason Moore (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Reich, George) Modified on 5/8/2023 (AMD).
March 23, 2023 Opinion or Order NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #10 Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement: Added Other Affiliates. (AMD)
March 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CORPORATE AND DIVERSITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Effectual Holdings LLC for Effectual Inc; Craig Atkinson, Catalyst Investors QP IV LP, Catalyst Investors IV LP, Daniel Tudahl, Five Talent Software Inc, Hemant Datta, Jaime Hirmas, Lumerity Capital Partners II LP, Lumerity Effectual LLC, Michael Parks, Robb Allen, Ryan Pardue, and SDC Effectual Investor LLC as Other Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1) and (2). Filed by Effectual Inc. (Pankratz, Adam) Modified on 3/23/2023 to add Affiliates (AMD).
March 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) re: #1 Notice of Removal by Effectual Inc.(Pankratz, Adam)
March 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney George Parker Reich on behalf of Plaintiff Jason Moore. (Reich, George)
March 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge David G Estudillo for all further proceedings. Judge Robert J. Bryan no longer assigned to case. Entered as directed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (TC)
March 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 3:21-cv-05890-DGE, by Defendant Effectual Inc. (Pankratz, Adam)
March 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal. ***Action Required*** Notice of Related Cases Omitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Notice of Related Case must be filed by 3/20/2023. (CDA)
March 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Pierce County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (AMD)
March 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Judge Robert J. Bryan added. (AMD)
March 15, 2023 Opinion or Order NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1), Defendant must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 3/22/2023. If applicable, a Diversity Disclosure Statement may be required pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(2). In order to properly notify the Court, use the event Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement located in CM/ECF under Other Filings, Other Documents.(AMD)
March 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DECLARATION of Terri Irizarry re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Effectual Inc (Pankratz, Adam)
March 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DECLARATION of Adam T. Pankratz re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Effectual Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(Pankratz, Adam)
March 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pierce County Superior Court, case number 23-2-04954-9; (Receipt # AWAWDC-7926805) filed by Effectual Inc. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pankratz, Adam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Effectual Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Moore
Represented By: George Parker Reich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Effectual Inc
Represented By: Adam T Pankratz
Represented By: Emma A. Healey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?