Anderson v. Navy Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff: Chazton Anderson
Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union
Case Number: 3:2023cv05506
Filed: June 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Robert J Bryan
Referring Judge: David G Estudillo
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPLY, filed by Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union, TO RESPONSE to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Culicover, Daniel)
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE, by Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union, to #7 MOTION for Default against Navy Federal Credit Union,. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Culicover, Daniel)
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Culicover, Daniel)
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Default against Navy Federal Credit Union, filed by Plaintiff Chazton Anderson. Noted by Clerk for 6/29/2023. (MW)
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Sarah N Turner on behalf of Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union. (Turner, Sarah)
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Daniel Culicover on behalf of Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union. (Culicover, Daniel)
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order NOTE: Document #4 was filed incorrectly/improperly. Appearance of attorney Daniel O. Culicover is not proper, and notices of electronic filing will not be sent until corrected. Signatures must be in accordance with FRCP 11 and LCR 83.2(a) and must comply with #ECF Filing Procedures. (MW)
June 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , filed by Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 7/21/2023, (Culicover, Daniel)
June 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge David G Estudillo for all further proceedings. Judge Robert J. Bryan no longer assigned to case. Entered as directed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (TC) Modified on 6/7/2023 to indicate that a paper copy was sent to Plaintiff at Fircrest address (TC).
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons(es) Issued in Paper Form as to defendant(s) Navy Federal Credit Union. (MW)
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Navy Federal Credit Union (Receipt # TAC 3-302) filed by Chazton Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Navy Federal Credit Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chazton Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union
Represented By: Daniel Culicover
Represented By: Sarah N Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?