Serrano v. State of Washington
| Ramil Agles Serrano |
| State of Washington |
| 3:2023cv05600 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John H Chun |
| S Kate Vaughan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 LETTER from Ramil A. Serrano. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Ramil Serrano, Prisoner ID: 413716) (CR) |
| NOTICE TO FILER: re #5 Letter. RE: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PRISONER E-FILING INITIATIVE. The Western District of Washington received documents from you for filing through the U.S. Postal Service. Pursuant to General Order 06-16, participation in the Prisoner E-Filing Initiative is mandatory for all prisoner litigants incarcerated at the Stafford Creek Corrections Center. These documents will be filed by the clerk in this instance, it is not necessary to refile. Please comply by submitting all future documents to be filed with this Court to the Law Librarian/designee for electronic filing. **0 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Ramil Serrano, Prisoner ID: 413716) (CR) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from Ramil Agles Serrano re #3 Case/IFP Deficiency Letter. **3 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Ramil Serrano, Prisoner ID: 413716) (CR) |
| NOTICE TO FILER: re #4 Letter. RE: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PRISONER E-FILING INITIATIVE. The Western District of Washington received documents from you for filing through the U.S. Postal Service. Pursuant to General Order 06-16, participation in the Prisoner E-Filing Initiative is mandatory for all prisoner litigants incarcerated at the Stafford Creek Corrections Center. These documents will be filed by the clerk in this instance, it is not necessary to refile. Please comply by submitting all future documents to be filed with this Court to the Law Librarian/designee for electronic filing. **0 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Ramil Serrano, Prisoner ID: 413716) (CR) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Proposed Document(s). ***Action Required*** 2241/2254 Filing Fee Not Paid.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 8/7/2023 to correct IFP application (Attachments: #1 Blank IFP Form) **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Ramil Serrano, Prisoner ID: 413716) (CR) |
| Filing 1 PROPOSED 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Ramil Agles Serrano (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)**23 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Ramil Serrano, Prisoner ID: 413716) (CR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Serrano v. State of Washington | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ramil Agles Serrano | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of Washington | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
