Fouts v. Mason County et al
| Nathan Bradley Fouts |
| Mason County, Jay Inslee, Healthcare Delivery Systems, Kevin F Hanson, Mason County Jail, Dian Houlton and Randy Newell |
| 3:2023cv05630 |
| July 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| David W Christel |
| Jamal N Whitehead |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court recommends this case be dismissed without prejudice. The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this report to file written objections. The Clerk is directed to set the matter for consideration on 9/8/2023. Signed by Judge David W. Christel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Judgment)(MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Proposed Document(s). ***Action Required*** 1983 Filing Fee Not Paid, Prison Trust Account Statement.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 8/14/2023 to correct IFP application (Attachments: #1 IFP Application Form) (TE) |
| Filing 1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Plaintiff Nathan Bradley Fouts. NO FILING FEE/NO IFP APPLICATION RECEIVED (TE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
