Caruk v. GEICO General Insurance Company
Stuart Caruk |
GEICO General Insurance Company doing business as GEICO |
3:2023cv05756 |
August 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
David G Estudillo |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Katherine B White on behalf of Defendant GEICO General Insurance Company. (White, Katherine) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint; with JURY DEMAND by GEICO General Insurance Company.(Donohue, Alfred) |
Filing 7 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, DISCOVERY, DEPOSITIONS AND EARLY SETTLEMENT: FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 11/13/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 11/20/2023, Joint Status Report due by 11/27/2023, Scheduling Conference set for 12/15/2023 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom B before U.S. District Judge David G. Estudillo. Signed by U.S. District Judge David G. Estudillo. (MGC) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge David G Estudillo for all further proceedings. Hon. S. Kate Vaughan no longer assigned to case. (SNP) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge if this form is not returned by 8/30/2023. Please Note: Forms must not be electronically filed with the Court. (SNP) |
Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Clark County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (MW) |
Hon. S. Kate Vaughan added. (MW) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE AND DIVERSITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Government Employees Insurance Company, Corporate Parent GEICO Corporation, Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway Inc. for GEICO General Insurance Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1) and (2). Filed by GEICO General Insurance Company. (Donohue, Alfred) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION of Alfred E. Donohue re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant GEICO General Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Donohue, Alfred) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Clark County Superior Court, case number 23-2-01899-06; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8134402) filed by GEICO General Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint)(Donohue, Alfred) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Caruk v. GEICO General Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Stuart Caruk | |
Represented By: | Beau D Harlan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GEICO General Insurance Company doing business as GEICO | |
Represented By: | Alfred E Donohue |
Represented By: | Katherine B White |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.