Hill v. Noort et al
| Horace Hill, Jr |
| Erika Noort, Rachelle Carelock and Phil Ard |
| 3:2023cv05923 |
| October 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tiffany M Cartwright |
| David W Christel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DECLINING TO SERVE. If Plaintiff intends to pursue a 1983 civil rights action in this Court, he must file an amended complaint on or before 12/6/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. (Attachments: #1 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint Form)(AMD)(cc: Pltf via USPS)
|
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Phil Ard, Rachelle Carelock, Erika Noort with JURY DEMAND filed by Horace Hill, Jr. (IFP Granted) (AMD) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING #1 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND FORWARD PAYMENTS, signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. (cc: Plaintiff, WAWD Finance, Clark Co Jail)(AMD)(cc: Pltf via USPS)
|
| Filing 7 LETTER from Horace Hill, Jr. (CR) |
| Filing 2 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (AMD)(cc: Pltf via USPS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge David W. Christel, filed by Horace Hill, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint)(AMD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
