Gee v Tacoma Superior Court et al
Kassidy Jo Gee |
Tacoma Superior Court, Alexander James Bossinas, Jr, Alicia Burton, Rebecca Powers, Marie Kyllo, Arthur Jones, Antoinette Armstrong, Beverly Allen and Diana Lynn Kiesel |
3:2023cv05951 |
October 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
David G Estudillo |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 OBJECTIONS by Plaintiff Kassidy Jo Gee to #3 Report and Recommendations. Noted by Clerk for 12/15/2023. (TE) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court recommends Plaintiff's Application to Proceed IFP (Dkt. #1 ) be DENIED. The Court further recommends this case be DISMISSED without prejudice. The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this report to file written objections. The Clerk is directed to set the matter for consideration on 12/1/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Grady J Leupold. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Judgment)(MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 2 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (TE) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis referred to Judge Grady J. Leupold filed by Kassidy Jo Gee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(TE) Modified on 10/24/2023 correct title of Complaint (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.