Dinh v. Umpqua Bank
| Nhu Dinh |
| Umpqua Bank |
| 3:2023cv05980 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| David W Christel |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MDL 3083 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 17); in re MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation; transferred to District of Massachusetts; assigned to Judge Allison D. Burroughs. (Attachments: #1 Email) (SS) |
| Case transferred to District of Massachusetts by electronic case transfer on 11/28/2023. (SS) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal. Signed by Judge David W. Christel. (LL)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Defendant Umpqua Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 11/3/2023, (Andrade, Jessica) Modified on 11/6/2023 (TE). |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal. ***Action Required*** Attorney Admission.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (AMD)(Ad Hoc Pltf Atty Sanders) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Pierce County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. JURY DEMAND - properly submitted state court jury demand on file (AMD)(Ad Hoc Pltf Atty Sanders) |
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #2 Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement : Corporate Parent added. (AMD) |
| Judge David W. Christel added. (AMD) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 3:23-cv-05753-DGE, 3:23-cv-05884-DGE, 3:23-cv-05941-BHS, by Defendant Umpqua Bank. (Andrade, Jessica) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE AND DIVERSITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Columbia Banking Systems Inc and Other Affiliate Vanguard Group, Inc. for Umpqua Bank. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1) and (2). Filed by Umpqua Bank. (Andrade, Jessica) Modified on 11/1/2023 to add corp parent (AMD). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pierce County Superior Court, case number 23-2-09568-1; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8220274) Attorney Jessica M Andrade added to party Umpqua Bank(pty:dft) filed by Umpqua Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Pierce County Superior Court Case Documents, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Andrade, Jessica) (Attachment 3 replaced on 11/1/2023) (AMD). (Attachment 3 replaced on 11/1/2023 due to malformed doc) (AMD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dinh v. Umpqua Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nhu Dinh | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Umpqua Bank | |
| Represented By: | Jessica M Andrade |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
