Recinos v. St Joseph Medical Center et al
| Tiffany Recinos |
| St Joseph Medical Center, Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals and Timothy L Wakenshaw |
| 3:2023cv06006 |
| November 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Benjamin H Settle |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
VEXATIOUS LITIGANT BAR ORDER, signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle.(AMD)
|
| ***Motion terminated: #13 MOTION for Default filed by Tiffany Recinos, per #9 Order - The Court will not entertain further filings in this case, other than a notice of appeal. (AMD) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Default and Default Summary Judgment, filed by Plaintiff Tiffany Recinos. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelopes)(AMD) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Tiffany Recinos re #9 Order. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelopes)(AMD) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER OF USCA (23-3790) as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Tiffany Recinos. A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal does not challenge a final order entered by the district court. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this appeal. DISMISSED (AMD)
|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT BY COURT. Recinos's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend. This case is closed. (MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER. Recinos's #4 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend. The Court will not entertain further filings in this case, other than a notice of appeal.The Clerk shall enter a JUDGMENT and close the case. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENTER BAR ORDER. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff Recinos to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should not issue a Bar Order finding Recinos to be a vexatious litigant. Her response is due no later than 21 days from the date of this Order. She may file it in this case or any other, but she need not file it in each case. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MW)
|
| Filing 7 USCA CASE NUMBER/TIME SCHEDULE ORDER 23-3790 as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Tiffany Recinos. (MW) |
| Filing 6 SHOW CAUSE WITH NOTICE OF APPEAL (23-3790) to Ninth Circuit by Plaintiff Tiffany Recinos. (cc: USCA) (MW) Modified to add CCA # on 11/29/2023 (MW). |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED Amended Complaint and Request for Injunction filed by Plaintiff Tiffany Recinos. (MW) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Theresa L Fricke filed by Tiffany Recinos. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(MW) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Proposed Complaint. ***Action Required*** Filing Fee Not Paid, Civil Cover Sheet Omitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 12/6/2023 to correct IFP application. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 IFP Application Form) (TE)(cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
| Filing 1 PROPOSED Complaint filed by Plaintiff Tiffany Recinos. (No Filing Fee/No IFP) (TE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
